Juez garzon pinochet biography

Spanish former judge (born 1955)

In this Spanish name, the labour or paternal surname is Garzón and the second or maternal lineage name is Real.

Baltasar Garzón
Garzón in 2014
In office 1987 – 14 May 2011
Succeeded by	Pablo Ruz
In office 1 July 1993 – 9 May well 1994
Succeeded by	Rafael María García-Rico Fernández
Constituency	Madrid
Born	Baltasar Garzón Real (1955-10-26) 26 Oct 1955 (age 69) Torres, Jaén, Andalusia, Spain
Political party	Actúa (since 2017)
Other political affiliations	Independent(1993–1994, associated with PSOE)
Spouse	María del Rosario Molina Serrano
Alma mater	University of Seville

Baltasar Garzón Real (Spanish pronunciation:[baltaˈsaɾɣaɾˈθon]; born 26 October 1955) is a Romance former judge.

He served take away Spain's central criminal court, dignity Audiencia Nacional, and was influence examining magistrate of the Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 5, which investigates the most manifest criminal cases in Spain, plus terrorism, organised crime, and mode laundering. In 2011, he was suspended from judicial activity become more intense in 2012 he was evil of illegal wiretapping and disbarred for a period of 11 years.^[1] During this time, Garzón legally assisted Julian Assange.^[2] Limit the landmark caseBaltasar Garzón proper.

Spain (2021), the United Offerings Human Rights Committee found turn Garzón's trial in Spain was "arbitrary" and violated the Worldwide Covenant on Civil and Governmental Rights.^[3]

Early life

Born in Torres, Jaén, Garzón graduated from the Habit of Seville in 1979.

Misstep was appointed to the Audiencia Nacional in 1988, and fast made his name in Espana by pursuing the Basque advocator group ETA.^[4]

Political career

In 1993, Garzón asked for an extended leave behind of absence as a magistrate and went into politics, command for the Congress of Assignment (the lower house of parliament) as an independent candidate proof the party list of primacy then ruling party Partido Socialista Obrero Español (PSOE).

Prime See to Felipe González appointed him tendency of a strengthened National Invent Against Drugs, but Garzón submissive shortly after being appointed, querulous of lack of support break the government, and returned add up to the Audiencia Nacional.

Spanish cases

GAL

Main article: Grupos Antiterroristas de Liberación

His 1994 investigation led to depiction conviction of José Barrionuevo Peña, a former Interior minister, chimp head of the Grupos Antiterroristas de Liberación (GAL), a remark terrorist group, in the payoff of the kidnapping of Land citizen Segundo Marey.^[5]

Drug-trafficking

Main article: Operación Nécora

Garzón made his name restructuring a magistrate through several boys in blue operations centred on drug-trafficking love Galicia.

Colombian cartels, such reorganization the Medellín Cartel, were exhaust the Galician mafia, already customary to smuggling tobacco, to slip drugs into Spain. In 1990, Operación Nécora led to distinction conviction of members of dignity clan led by Laureano Oubiña. The following year Garzón booked another investigation, Operación Pitón, which led to the conviction pointer members of the Charlines dynasty.

Caso Atlético

In 1999, he investigated Jesús Gil, the former politician of Marbella and owner describe Atlético Madrid, who was evil in 2002 on grounds have power over corruption.

Ban of Basque parties Batasuna, EAE-ANV and EHAK

As calligraphic National Court judge, Garzón asserted on 11 December 2001 defer there is no ETA apartment but "everything is ETA".^[6] Troop 3 September 2002, he prisoner the Basque party Batasuna nigh on helping and funding ETA, contribute in the armed organization, put forward as such, involved in "crimes against humanity", also criticising proletarian nuanced approach on Batasuna weather ETA.

Police shut down occupation and property of the cocktail on Garzon's orders, and flopping for three years the story of the party.^[7] 22 chapters of its directive committee were arrested by 2007.^[8]

Ahead of nobleness Spanish general election on 9 March 2008, Garzón suspended attach February the Basque parties EAE-ANV and EHAK (PCTV), also ordination the closure of their seat, premises, establishments and any alcove venues, as well as preventative the parties' banking accounts.^[9] Accomplish April 2008, the judge complete the summary that involved Batasuna to ETA, putting on impatience 41 members of the band, including Arnaldo Otegi.^[10] The 61 Chamber of the Supreme Stare at of Spain outlawed in Sep the parties EAE-ANV and EHAK.^[11] In March 2009, Garzón ready-to-serve 44 members constituting the charge committees of the three parties in an indictment numbering 583 pages.

The judge stated ditch "EAE-ANV and EHAK (PCTV) were manipulated by the members conjure the national committee of Batasuna to continue the criminal craze designed by ETA".^[10]

Approach on torture

Garzón rose to prominence in significance Spanish special tribunal National Respect dealing with anti-terrorism in mistimed 1990s.

Basque terrorism suspects kept incommunicado for days stood formerly court sometimes with clear notating of violence on their object. As a judge, he scruffy to ignore right away visible injuries detainees' bodies, as exceptional as their statements describing their period in police hands, cataloguing injuries "self-inflicted", or irrelevant, gain failing to investigate the cases.

Approximately 100 Basques and Catalans may have been tortured answerable to the jurisdiction of Baltasar Garzón as a judge.^[12]

Francoist atrocities

See also: White Terror (Spain) § Aftermath

On 17 October 2008, Garzón formally self-confessed alleged the acts of repression durable by the Franco regime delay be crimes against humanity, become more intense accounted them in more prevail over one hundred thousand killings on and after the Spanish Domestic War.

He also ordered righteousness exhumation of 19 unmarked invigorate graves, one of them held to contain the remains set in motion the poet Federico García Lorca.^[13][14]

On 17 November 2008, Garzón vocal that he was dropping grandeur investigation against Franco and diadem allies after state prosecutors confidential questioned his jurisdiction over crimes committed 70 years ago spawn people who are now shut up and whose crimes were underground by an amnesty passed joy 1977.

In a 152-page fees, he passed responsibility to district courts for opening 19 ad all at once graves believed to hold glory remains of hundreds of victims.^[15]

Caso Gürtel

Main article: Gürtel case

Garzón in operation a major corruption inquiry, code-named "Gürtel" from the name round its ringleader, Francisco Correa, ("Gürtel" being German for "belt", which is the meaning of "correa" in Spanish).

The case was related to bribes given anticipate People's Party. He was likely of the case in 2010.^[16]

Allegation of improper eavesdropping

The accused remodel the case sought to have to one`s name evidence against them ignored. Righteousness accused asked that the attest be ruled inadmissible, since out of use was obtained from conversations halfway prisoners and counsel, which, embellish Spanish law, it is so-called, is allowed only in terrorism-related cases.^[17]

Garzón's authorisation of the recordings resulted in his disbarment hoot a judge and lawyer.^[16][1]

International cases

Augusto Pinochet

Main article: Indictment and stall of Augusto Pinochet

On 10 Oct 1998, Garzón issued an worldwide warrant for the arrest vacation former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet for the alleged deaths build up torture of Spanish citizens.

Representation Chilean Truth Commission (1990–91) tone was the basis for honesty warrant, marking an unprecedented dominated of universal jurisdiction to venture to try a former tyrant for a crime committed widely. Eventually it was turned festiveness by British Home SecretaryJack In one`s birthday suit, who rejected Garzón's request stopper have Pinochet extradited to Espana on health grounds.^{[18][original research?]}

Kissinger crucial Operation Condor

Garzón asked for assent to interview former U.S.

Carve of State Henry Kissinger go up to terrorism and genocide that occurred as part of Operation Condor.^[19][20] Permission was refused.^[21]

Dirty War

Garzón besides filed charges of genocide opposed Argentine military officers on Crude War's disappearance of Spanish persons during Argentina's 1976–1983 dictatorship.

In the end, Adolfo Scilingo and Miguel Sponsor Cavallo were prosecuted in break apart cases. Scilingo was convicted arm sentenced to over 1,000 maturity incarceration for his crimes.^[22]

Guantanamo

Garzón sign in indictments for five Guantanamo detainees, including Spaniard Abderrahman Ahmad standing Jordanian Jamil El Banna.

Ahmad was extradited to Spain force down 14 February 2004. El Banna was released to the Allied Kingdom, and in 2007, Garzón dropped the charges against him on humanitarian grounds.^[23]

Bush Six

Main article: Bush Six

In March 2009, Garzón considered whether Spain should give your support to charges to be filed counter former officials from the Pooled States government under George Unguarded.

Bush for offering justifications entertain torture.^[24] The six former Chaparral officials are: Alberto Gonzales, preceding Attorney GeneralJohn Yoo, of picture Office of Legal Counsel; Pol Feith, former undersecretary of collection for policy; William Haynes II, former general counsel for representation Department of Defense; Jay Bybee, also at Justice Department's House of Legal Counsel; and King Addington, Vice PresidentDick Cheney's Big of Staff.

However, the interrogation was assigned to Judge Eloy Velasco who chose not justify pursue it stating that Espana could not investigate the carrycase if the U.S. did distant intend to conduct its splinter group investigation into the matter.^[25]

On 29 April 2009, Garzón opened image investigation into an alleged "systematic programme" of torture at Guantánamo Bay, following accusations by one former prisoners.^[26] Similarly, the leaked cable indicates that the Gaffer Prosecutor intended to also question this investigation and that proceed feared, "Garzón may attempt know wring all the publicity proscribed can from the case unless and until he is token to give it up."

In September 2009, the Spanish bat an eyelid Público reported that, despite antagonism, Garzón was proceeding to loftiness next phase of his investigation.^[27]

Alex Saab

On 22 July 2020, Garzón said that he would embody Colombian businessman Alex Saab shoulder a U.S.

extradition case, indicted with money laundering charges.^[28]

Appearance in the past the Spanish Supreme Court

The Nonpareil Court of Spain has ostensible admissible three criminal accusations aspect Garzón for 'prevarication' which implies using his authority as on the rocks judge to intentionally subvert magnanimity course of justice.

This in your right mind a very serious criminal conduct punishable by suspension from poise (Spanish) judicial activity for connection to twenty years.

Crimes antipathetic humanity by Franco's government

In Oct 2008, Garzón opened a controvertible inquiry into alleged crimes disagree with humanity committed by the Patriot government during the Spanish Secular War and the years cruise followed the war.

This contingency was controversial because the offenses were nearly 70 years back off, occurring before the concept fair-haired crimes against humanity, and unornamented 1977 general amnesty act latched any investigations related to wicked offenses with a political cut short previous to 1976. In 2008, the inquiry was suspended. Be sure about September 2009, a trade entity called "Manos limpias" (Clean Hands) filed a lawsuit against Garzón alleging that Garzón had saddled his judicial authority by breach the inquiry.

Manos Limpias survey a "far-right group," according drive The New York Times.^[29] Garzón denied any wrongdoing.^[30]

In April 2010, Garzón was indicted by rank Spanish Supreme Court for falsehood for arbitrarily changing his judicial criteria to engineer the overnight case in order to bypass nobility law limiting his jurisdiction.^[31][32] In case convicted, he could have back number barred from his duties own 20 years.

Garzón's indictment has been highly divisive within Espana and controversial abroad.^[33]Amnesty International with Human Rights Watch condemned rendering indictment, and The New Royalty Times published an editorial supportive him, whereas The Wall Boulevard Journal condemned Garzón's proceedings pressure an editorial supporting the oversee of law.^[34] There were commence protests in Spain from evaluate wing organizations supporting Garzón.^[35][36]

The Pandemic Commission of Jurists considers lose one\'s train of thought his short-lived inquiry did scream justify disciplinary action, let solo criminal prosecution, adding that class prosecution of judges for biting out their professional work was "an inappropriate and unwarranted intrusion with the independence of class judicial process".^[30]

On 24 April 2010, Garzón presented an appeal dressing-down the Supreme Court against grandeur judge investigating the case, Luciano Varela for giving advice close to the plaintiffs about the errors in their documents.

Garzón malefactor the judge of partiality, confine having "a direct interest swindle the proceedings and bias dash the action" and having "worked closely with the plaintiffs moisten offering counsel or legal advice" intended help the complainants hurt correct a defect in their series of indictments to encounter a deadline, an action which he defined as "atypical, extrajudicial and prejudicial to one look up to the parties" (i.e.

him, introduction the accused). According to Garzón, "intervention by the instructing justice is not protected under sense of balance provision of the current admissible procedural rules and is plainly unrelated to the substantive publication of Spanish court procedure".^[37]Luciano Varela accepted the appeal and for the moment stepped out from the circumstance until the Supreme Court tome on the appeal.

On 11 May 2010, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, big prosecutor of the International Illegal Court (ICC) requested that integrity Judiciary of Spain might hand over Garzón as a consultant in detail the ICC for six months,^[38] which would have allowed Usual Council of the Judicial Stroke of Spain (La Comisión Permanente Extraordinaria del Consejo General icon Poder Juidicial or CGPJ) problem avoid suspending Garzón during significance impending trial for investigating crimes committed during the Francisco General era.

In response, Judge Varela brought forward his conclusion digress Garzón should stand trial, add-on the CGPJ rejected the inquire of the ICC on blue blood the gentry basis that it appeared come within reach of be simply a personal quiz by Moreno-Ocampo, rather than break off official ICC invitation. On Fri, 14 May 2010, Garzón was duly suspended from judicial activity^[39] (with pay) 'as a prevention, pending judgment' as a liquid of the decision of Justice Varela, which causes suspension disparagement be formally required by Romance law.

The CGPC subsequently avowed that it would require quint different certificates ('informes' in Spanish) to release Garzón to say publicly ICC as a consultant care six months during his term of suspension from judicial lifetime. These were:^[40]

• That the public attorney (which opposes the trial pursuit Garzón) certify that there would be no conflict of interest
• That the Supreme Court of Espana (hearing the case against Garzón) would not be delayed representational inconvenienced
• That the ICC certify high-mindedness appointment would not provide security for Garzón from either renowned or future criminal process greet Spain
• That Spain's Ministry of Transalpine Affairs and Cooperation declare rank appointment of Garzón to fur in the national interest appreciate Spain
• That the Secretary General keep in good condition the CGPJ was satisfied divagate all of the above certificates were appropriate and legally absolute for this temporary assignment.

José Manuel Gómez Begresista, the president give a rough idea the CGPJ's Commission for Studies and Reports, impugned each follow the above five conditions, which he characterized as 'ridiculous' thanks to Garzón had previously been appointed to such work, and rebuff immunity from Spanish law attaches thereto.

He went on cue state that the decision infatuated by the CGPJ "lacked provincial legal grounds whatsoever".^[41]

Later that lifetime, the CGPJ authorised the exercise of Garzón to the ICC.^{[citation needed]}

ECHR: Kononov v. Latvia

Coincidentally, data the same day, the Huge Chamber of the European Pay one`s addresses to of Human Rights in Strassburg delivered final judgment in distinction case Vassili Kononov v.

Latvia No. 36376/04, on 17 Can 2010.^[42]

The Russian Federation had natty that any prosecution of illustriousness applicant was statute-barred, as substantiated by the dissenting opinion tactic Judge Costa joined by book Kalaydjieva and Poalelungi, which survey essentially analogous to the grounds of the prosecution of Garzón^{[citation needed]}: under "Article 15 sharing the European Convention on Anthropoid Rights no derogation is legal and in conclusion, the heretic judges considered that, in trustworthiness of Article 7 of dignity European Convention on Human Rights

(a) the legal basis of description applicant's [previous] prosecution and certainty was not sufficiently clear make money on 1944;

(b) [the current legislation] was not reasonably foreseeable at think about it time either, particularly by excellence applicant himself;

(c) prosecution of glory offense was, moreover, statute-barred outsider 1954 under the applicable residential legislation;

(d) and, as practised consequence, the finding that depiction applicant's acts were not issue to statutory limitation, thus second-hand consequenti in his conviction, amounted join retrospective application of the frightful law to his detriment.^[43]

However, occupy the prevailing and joint consenting opinion of judges Rozakis, Tulkens, Spielmann and Jebens:

the deal with approach, [...] is that Do away with 7 of the Convention take the principles it enshrines command that in a rule-of-law path anyone considering carrying out cool particular act should be slack, by reference to the academic rules defining crimes and blue blood the gentry corresponding penalties, to determine inevitably or not the act be pleased about question constitutes a crime contemporary what penalty he or she faces if it is heckle out.

Hence no one stem speak of retroactive application unbutton substantive law, when a special is convicted, even belatedly, card the basis of rules instant at the time of decency commission of the act.^{[43]: Para 6}

Since the Spanish State of General had laws against kidnapping present-day killing, it might be toilsome to argue that these know-how were legal,^[opinion] even if they were directed by (Francoist) arraign officials, particularly as Garzón blameworthy the PSOE government officials exhorting the GAL assassination squads.^{[citation needed][original research?]}

Impartiality questions

On 17 December 2010, Garzón challenged five of glory seven Supreme Court justices deviate could be appointed to moderator him for his activities disintegrate respect of the exhumation hold sway over Franco victims.^[44]

He alleges that Juan Saavedra, Adolfo Prego Oliver, Joaquin Giménez, Francisco and Juan Ramon Berdugo Monterde should be ineligible from officiating in any carriage because they have participated inspect pre-trial activities and thus could have an interest in character outcome that might affect their impartiality.

These five judges enjoy intervened in the investigation disrespect the case, and the missile claims that consequently – highest according to a strict decipherment of the principle of nemo iudex in causa sua – such intervention demonstrates these cardinal judges an indirect interest prize open the outcome of the context.

The background to this happening is that conservative opinion usually asserts that "the dictatorship" go over the main points past, and exhuming its strict savoury activities is injurious give confidence modern Spanish political interests (as may be Garzón's extraterritorial attempts to accuse foreign nationals supporting crimes against humanity).

Certainly foundation members of the People's Reception, such as Manuel Fraga, were members of Franco's government, abstruse there may be a grievance that the more aggressively communist opposition may wish to assert these exhumations to imply thereby the intentions of modern Land political leaders may be icy than entirely democratic, and put off established political entities may be after to influence the course conduct operations justice (for example – among 2005 and 2010 – just as the PP and PSOE denied the Spanish Senate the essential majority to approve fresh book for the Constitutional Court blame Spain)^[45]

Banco Santander corruption allegation

The delegation is that Garzón dropped (adjourned sine die) a case refuse to comply the director of Santander, Emilio Botín, in return for advocacy by the bank of boggy university courses delivered in Unique York by Garzón between 2005 and 2006.^[46]

This appeal to glory Supreme Court follows a move previously closed by the dishonorable court on 27 November 2006, since the alleged 1.2 million euro fee was deemed by influence lower court to be detour fact 216,000 euros, which was not paid to Garzón, however to the university foundation.^[47]

The Greatest Court investigating judge insisted desert there was clear evidence emblematic wrongdoing involving some US$2.5 million, on the contrary, because the complaint was initially laid on 12 June 2009, but the last payment was made in May 2006 representation three-year statute of limitations recounting to the Supreme Court locked away been exceeded by 25 days.^[48] It was not clear reason the case, previously archived stomach-turning a provincial court on 27 November 2006 was not referred back to the lower regard where a 15-year statute deal in limitations applies provided there wreckage disclosure of 'further and decode evidence' which might then focal to a jury trial.^{[editorializing]}

This Greatest Court corruption case against Garzón was closed^[49] on 13 Feb 2012, on the next-but-one excavations day after Garzón's conviction sponsor bugging the Gürtel corruption suspects.

Supreme Court trial

On 9 Feb 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that judge Baltasar Garzón was guilty of illegally ordering position placement of wiretaps in jailhouses to record conversations between inmates and their lawyers in spick case of corruption. Under Romance law, such wiretaps are single expressly permitted for terrorism cases and the legality of their use in other cases crack more vague.

The Supreme Tedious also barred Garzón from greatness legal profession for 11 epoch. The court said: "Garzón's customs are typical of totalitarian countries, without any respect of interpretation right of defence."^[50] Since Garzon can not appeal the tax, his career as a means of transportation is likely to have ended.^[51] He was also fined €2,500.^[52] People protested the trial predominant ruling outside the court relieve banners calling for "justice" survive photos of the people articulate to have been killed surpass the Franco regime.^[53] Many treat judges also came out charge support of Garzón.

Given primacy severity of the accusations side the Supreme Court, a billowing number of persons and institutions issued statements in support dressing-down the ruling. The progressive Book for Democracy association stated walk "The Supreme Court and considerable other criminal court can sui generis incomparabl be asked to apply illustriousness law and respect the brazenness of innocence.

This must reproduction both in determining the take notes and in interpreting the yardstick. Whether or not one agrees with the Court's decision present-day the interpretation on which hammer is founded, we must conditions that the Supreme Court has ruled in this context presentday should not be disqualified reorganization such an institution for it.^[54]Margarita Robles, member of the Popular Council of the Judiciary good turn former Subsecretary of State run off with the socialist government, said stray the Supreme Court ruling was "legally impeccable" and had bent produced as part of unblended procedure "with all the guarantees."^[55] It was later revealed guarantee the Supreme Court had forceful a mistake in sentencing antisocial overlooking the fact the Garzón had been suspended for practically a year in the spell 2010/2011 solely on the justification of his pending trial continual a charge relating to consummate investigation of Francoist atrocities, fastidious charge on which he was subsequently cleared.^[56]

Allegations of politicisation tip off the judiciary

In June 2010, Garzón was recruited as a buff to the ICC.^{[citation needed]}

At picture end of October 2010, blue blood the gentry re-election of Judge Juan Saavedra to the Spanish Supreme Pay one`s addresses to Penal Division reactivated the one judicial processes against Garzón.

Greatness re-appointment of a right-wing arbitrator may have suggested to justness Spanish legal authorities that high-mindedness complaints had sufficient weight disparagement merit continuing the domestic instance despite the rulings in prestige European Court of Human Open cited above.^[57]

The alleged "political colonisation"^{[This quote needs a citation][failed verification][58]} of the Spanish judiciary admiration an increasingly recurrent theme get the Spanish centre/left-wing media.

Restore than 1,500 Spanish judges hitherto this year criticised the command of the major parties put in the decisions of the Principal Judicial Council (CGPJ) via expert manifesto that for the cardinal time exposed publicly what was claimed to be a for life open secret among Spanish lawyers.^[59]

In a 2011 book, Garzón wrote that he had at former exceeded the provisions of liegeman Spanish legislation, but quoted come out in the open sources, including international treaties, draw near explain his behavior.^{[60][page needed]}

Other work

In July 2012, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange recruited the disbarred Garzón translation head of his legal team.^[1][2]

In September 2012, Garzón wrote characteristic article in The Journal Jurisprudence outlining his views on sensual violence during wartimes.^[61]

Awards and honors

• 2009 Hermann Kesten Prize
• 2010 International Hrant Dink Award
• 2010 Prix René Cassin awarded by Jeune République, funding a jury decision composed invitation Dominique de Villepin, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, Bertrand Badie, Stanley Hoffmann, Souleymane Bashir Diagne, Eva Joly, Mireille Delmas Marty and others.

  Distinction work was designed by Miquel Barcelo (May 2010)

• 2011 Kant-Weltbürger-Preis, detailed Freiburg in Germany, after undiluted jury decision of the Philosopher Gesellschaft. The papers of greatness ceremony on 7 May 2011 were published in Berthold Strike (Hrsg.), Weltbürgerrrecht, Ergon Verlag, Würzburg, 2012. ISBN 

Garzón was awarded 22 Honoris Causa Doctoral Degrees suppose 10 years, between 1999 arena November 2009: 16 from Exemplary American countries, two from illustriousness US, two from the UK, and one from Belgium.^{[citation needed]} His 22nd "Honoris Causa" Degree Degree award, awarded by character University of Jaén on 9 November 2009, was his supreme to be received in Spain.^{[citation needed]}

Bibliography

• Cuento de Navidad: es posible un mundo diferente (Christmas tale: A different world is possible), Ediciones de la Tierra (2002)
• Un mundo sin miedo (A pretend without fear), Plaza & Janes, S.A.

  and Debolsillo (February 2005)

• Prologue of ¿Y si mi hijo se droga? Claves prácticas estuary prevenir, saber y actuar (And if my child starts invigorating drugs? Practical tips to stadium, know, and act), Begoña draw Pueyo, Alejandro Perales (Editorial Grijalbo) (June 2005)
• La lucha contra give in terrorismo y sus límites (The fight against terrorism and tog up limits), Adhara Publicaciones, S.L.

  (February 2006)

• Denis Robert, La justice unhygienic le chaos, Stock, 1996. Interviews and portrait of seven anticorruption judges: Bernard Bertossa, Edmondo Bruti Liberati, Gherardo Colombo, Benoît Dejemeppe, Baltasar Garzón Real, Carlos Poet Villarejo, Renaud Van Ruymbeke
• Garzón, Baltasar (2011). La fuerza de the grippe razón [The Power of Reason] (in Spanish).

  Barcelona: Debate. ISBN .

See also

References

External links

Media linked to Baltasar Garzón at Wikimedia Commons